The Wayfarer Philosophy

Here it is, the day after Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts. In this aftermath, Barack Obama’s talking points as uttered by himself and Robert Gibbs, his propagandist is that “it doesn’t have to do with the last one or two years, but rather the last eight years. Still blaming Bush. It doesn’t seem like such a hot explanation given the fact that Massachusetts is a dark blue state, and supposedly, according to Obama and his political advisors, the people decided to show their anger with George Bush by electing a Republican rather than the Democrat that Obama endorsed and spoke for. Yeah, Obama-logic rarely makes sense, but this is going to a whole new low in their perception of the intelligence of the American people.

According to Scott Brown’s own opinion polls, most of the people who voted for him did so because of national security. If you remember, that was one area where John F. Kennedy, a true Democrat, was strong in. Of course, the healthcare debate has a lot to do with it. Although liberal, the majority of the people in Massachusetts disagree with Obamacare just like the majority of people in the United States.

One troubling issue is that many people blame the problems solely on the Democrat leadership in congress. Of course, Harry Reed’s backroom deals and Nancy Pilosi’s blatant disregard for the will of the people are major factors. We need also put equal blame on the Obama administration’s policies. He has been touring around, campaigning, and basically pimping all the different plans that have been coming out of the congress. He chose to put the Stimulus bill in Nancy Pilosi’s hands and supported it afterwards. Obama’s people have been in Harry Reed’s backroom meetings helping to craft whatever monstrosity of a bill they are finalizing now. Why can’t he share some of the blame too? He has endorsed three Democratic candidates in Virginia, New Jersey, and now Massachusetts that have all lost to Republicans, anon Gd he still blames it on George Bush?

To Obama: No slick, the American people are sick of all the things that your and the other Democrat leaders have been doing. We would be willing to give you time to address the economy , but we actually have. I know that things cannot change dramatically in one year, but give us credit for having thoughts about your decisions in trying to address the issue. We know that punishing and demonizing businesses is not going to help create jobs. You’re just playing to peoples’ emotions and trying to get more money to spend. Making deals with your money-donors and the special interest like the special union tax waiver in the healthcare bill just shows that you lied about not listening to the special interest. Somehow your special interest groups are special and the others are evil.

So union members that have the same healthcare plan as non-union members don’t have to pay the 40 percent tax that the rest of the people have to? So, Nebraska gets a special deal on Medicaid to buy Ben Nelson’s vote? So Louisiana gets a special $300 million deal to get Mary Landrieu’s vote? So Bill Nelson’s vote got bought for allowing seniors to keep Medicare advantage in 3 Democratic counties in Florida while the rest of the state and country don’t?

Call me silly, but if you were not in favor of these deals, you might have spoken out against them.

Call me naive, but you probably could have requested that Harry Reed’s backroom deals in the Obamacare meetings the last few weeks could have been televised on C-Span like you promised eight times. At least you could have called for it.

Maybe you could have argued against the taxes on healthcare plans that will actually make healthcare plans more expensive for us, unlike your promises of reducing our expenses.

Nahhhh.. none of that had to do with Massachusetts voting in a Republican into a senate seat that has been occupied by Democrats for the last 58 years. Besides, it’s Bush’s fault that they voted for a Republican. Yeah, you make a lot of sense… dumbass.

Well, the Democrats’ most recent version of Obamacare made it past the last major hurdle over the weekend. Obama’s quick to come out and pimp this latest version, and pour out the usual propaganda. With literally ALL of the major national polls showing that the American people are against even this latest plan, which only got released after voting on it (more of that Obama transparency), he has got to convince us that we are wrong and this is what we really want.

So, after working over the CBO, they come out with the numbers that the Democrats wanted. The Obamacare bill will actually save the government money. With half a trillion dollars being taken out of Medicare, and another half of trillion dollars in tax increases on our existing healthcare plans, the government will actually save money in the next 10 years. Amazing! The government saves money by taking it away from the people! Nice, huh? They save more money by throwing the uninsured onto Medicaid, and forcing the states to pay for it instead of the federal government. I wonder if those costs will trickle down to the people to? Nebraska is safe though, they bought Ben Nelson’s vote off by making Nebraska the only states excluded from having to pay the skyrocketing Medicaid costs that this bill creates.

Didn’t Barack Obama promise us that this was going to reduce the cost of healthcare? Yeah, but that doesn’t matter, increasing the costs on all of us is best for us anyway, that way the government can control everything, and the high costs are worth paying for creating this enormous bureaucracy.

So, by putting us on the hook for it, Obama says that the government will save $130 billion in the first 10 years of Obamacare, and then $1 trillion over the next 10 years. But wait a second, doesn’t those savings all get eaten up by the fact that Obama has promised the poor nations of the world that we will pay them $100 billion a year for climate change? Looks like Obama has already sent our governments saving anyway, just the week before. Oh well, looks like we’re on the hook for already spent savings.

The following, self-described “moderate” or “Blue Dog” Senate Democrats are a bunch of liars that have pulled the wool over the eyes of their constituents. harry Reed, liberal idiot from Nevada, created this whopping 2,000 page bill that taxes the hell out of all our health plans to pay for a new government health insurance company. It doesn’t fix a damn thing about health care, it just creates a huge government bureaucracy that rules over the private health plans and creates a whole new national insurance company. The government will run the every aspect of health treatment in this country. You think it’s hard to deal with your insurance company, try having to deal with the government!

The Liars

Evan Bayh – Indiana

Mary Landrieu – Louisiana

Blanche Lincoln – Arkansas

Mary Landrieu was bought off for $100 million in Harry Reed’s
healthcare bill where our tax dollars will go to Louisiana as a favor for voting this forward. She’s also going to pay Reed back by having a fund raiser for his senate campaign. Would a moderate do that? Would an HONEST senator do that?

Ben Nelson – nebraska

The Lie

the vote that they had in the senate this past Saturday required 60 votes to go on. Now, only one of these supposed moderates needed to vote no to stop it. They all voted yes. They put a yes vote for all of the far-left big spending plans that have gone before them in the Senate. they have shown no signs of being moderate, because they AREN’T. Now, they said that they won’t vote for the bill the way it is. They are just voting yes so that there can be debate on the bill to change it. Well, if it’s a bad bill, then why vote it forward to debate it? Why not cut it off and start over on a new one that’s better? Instead, now that the bill is going forward, it will not require 60 votes for it to be passed. In other words, now these supposed moderates made it so that their votes “no” won’t even matter in the future. By voting yes on Saturday, they have made it impossible to stop. So now, the left wing of the Democrat party can add whatever the hell they want to it and then pass it on a simple 51 vote majority. This was their chance to show a shade of being moderate, but they decided not to. These idiots really think that we can beleive that it’s prudent to shine up a turd instead of starting over with a good bill?

These so-called “Blue Dog Democrats” are really a bunch of “Lap Dog Dummycrats.”

They are liars. They are Subversive. They must go!

Whty not at least be honest about being left-wing liberals?